SAMPLE OUTPUTS

What the work looks like

Redacted Decision Gate briefings — anonymised for public viewing.

Not case studies. Simplified samples: evidence ledger, closure requirements, and priced exposure when evidence is missing.

Senior-led· Confidential by default· Board-defensible format

Decision Gate briefings · redacted PDFs

Redacted Decision Gate briefings

Three complete examples. Each is “display-only” and anonymised. Use them to understand the rigor and the shape — not the client.

  • Incident Readiness Modernization — New Tooling

    Decision: whether a change to the incident response model and tooling should proceed now, under a short decision window.

    Tier-1 operations Readiness Controls Decision record
    Open PDF
  • Third-party AI Vendor Commitment

    Decision: whether production commitment should proceed as-is, and what minimum evidence closures make approval defensible.

    Vendor Contract rights Data & logs Lock-in
    Open PDF
  • Platform Transition — Cutover & Dependency Risk

    Decision: whether a platform transition should proceed now, given dependency uncertainty, rollback ambiguity, and sequencing risk.

    Cutover Dependencies Identity Commercial exposure
    Open PDF

Note: The redactions are intentional. These samples exist to show the standard and the decision frame — the “what must be true,” the evidence bar, and the exposure you approve if evidence is missing.

Use the same frame on your decision.

If your commitment is time-sensitive, start at the Decision Window and request a time-boxed review.

Request an engagement